PDA

View Full Version : XR3-3.7 (Share Ideas/How to make it work stable)


dallas
11-11-2008, 09:55 AM
I have learned a lot. I thought it would be a great idea if everyone shared how to make it work. I got my setup to work very well in this setup.


Backhauls are 5.8ghz turbo (Backhauls using routeros 3.16 with wireless test)
ONLY 1 XR3 card per tower location!!!
Use omni ONLY!!!
Using the 10mhz channel
Routeros 3.13
DONT USE lightning protectors. I used SP6 and it kills the XR3 cards. Anyone has a lightning protector that works?

3.65 is working great. If you have bad signals do this:
leave on default power and make sure you use 3.13 routeros. That will fix your problems.

Please share you ideas. I shared mine

dallas
11-11-2008, 09:57 AM
Ohh yeah I get 10+mbps both directions with 10mhz channel. And I use nstreme. Very stable.

tamahome
02-14-2009, 12:01 AM
why using 3.13 for 3.65ghz? 3.20 doesnt work?

another thing, you are testing PtP right? Are the Nano3 available yet?

dallas
02-14-2009, 11:44 AM
I am using 3.20. Works great. No problems at all. I am using backhaul and point to multipoint.

tamahome
02-14-2009, 12:13 PM
for being a higher frequency works better than 2.4 with clear LOS right?

its really unlinced 3.65Ghz?

WHT
02-14-2009, 01:03 PM
DONT USE lightning protectors. I used SP6 and it kills the XR3 cards. Anyone has a lightning protector that works?
Protection on the LAN side is network neutral - for the most part, it might cut you CAT5 100 Mbps speed distance by ten percent.

Any more details on why protection isn't working for you?

neofast
02-15-2009, 02:56 PM
for being a higher frequency works better than 2.4 with clear LOS right?

its really unlinced 3.65Ghz?

No, 3.65 is NEVER "unlicensed".

tamahome
02-15-2009, 03:36 PM
so with Ubiquiti is promoting "3.65 GHz Unlicensed Wireless with Contention Protocol" ?

http://www.ubnt.com/products/xr3.php

WHT
02-15-2009, 08:36 PM
There are offering to people that want to deploy a licensed solution.

tamahome
02-16-2009, 01:50 AM
it says "3.65 GHz Unlicensed Wireless with Contention Protocol
3.5 GHz Licensed Versatile Radio Platform"

I understood that 3.5 its licensed and 3.65 not

dallas
02-16-2009, 07:08 AM
for being a higher frequency works better than 2.4 with clear LOS right?

its really unlinced 3.65Ghz?

3.65 in the us is licensed.

dallas
02-16-2009, 07:09 AM
so with Ubiquiti is promoting "3.65 GHz Unlicensed Wireless with Contention Protocol" ?

http://www.ubnt.com/products/xr3.php

its unlicensed in a different county maybe.

WHT
02-16-2009, 07:10 AM
Generally in most countries, 3.5 Gig is licensed for exclusive and available through auctions, open market sale, and government grants.

3.65 is for non-exclusive shared use and available with a fixed, small registration fee or for free if license exempt.

tamahome
02-16-2009, 07:11 AM
oooh I see. ty..

dallas
12-18-2009, 09:24 AM
I have Successfully got 3.65 to go more than 10 miles away stably. A lot to talk about. Just call me.

402-641-7692 cell
402-534-2502 ext 22
dallasweitzel@gmail.com

necoo
09-03-2010, 07:16 PM
I am using 3.20. Works great. No problems at all. I am using backhaul and point to multipoint.

Lina
09-16-2010, 02:03 AM
:ubnt_banana:

Lina-lanbowan communications Ltd.
sales@lanbowan.com

omega1
10-08-2010, 04:39 PM
Has anyone tried the 3.4 Ghz if so how do you set it up

nikole95
01-16-2011, 08:07 AM
for being a higher frequency works better than 2.4 with clear LOS right?

its really unlinced 3.65Ghz?

Protection on the LAN side is network neutral - for the most part, it might cut you CAT5 100 Mbps speed distance by ten percent.

CzechEnglishFrenchGermanItalianPolishPortugueseRussianSpanish
Translations delivered by vBET Translator 3.5.4