ljenkins
08-18-2009, 03:23 PM
Hey guys, I was just curious about experiences from others on moving from the older legacy 2.4 nanos and bullets to newer M nano and bullets.
The reason I am asking is I have a few areas that could use some improvements to performance and range. forgive me ahead of time if these questions seem a bit noobish. I run 80% of my networks in b-mode still.
1. Do the nano's and bullet's seem to have better sensitivity? i.e (4 mile link with cpe=nano2 ap=bullet with sectoral, signal=-71) will the newer nano2M's be able to provide that -71 in exact conditions or will it be better, worse?
2. do the rates in n and g scale to each other in any way as far as range and sensitivity? (24mbps g compared to like ~40mbps n)
All I can think of right now. wanting to buy some of these soon. thanks for input.
***Edit***
I was also wanting to know if the loco M and nano M will even be in 2.4Ghz, couldnt find any info about those
***Edit...again***
actually meant 2.4 Ghz for RocketM
The reason I am asking is I have a few areas that could use some improvements to performance and range. forgive me ahead of time if these questions seem a bit noobish. I run 80% of my networks in b-mode still.
1. Do the nano's and bullet's seem to have better sensitivity? i.e (4 mile link with cpe=nano2 ap=bullet with sectoral, signal=-71) will the newer nano2M's be able to provide that -71 in exact conditions or will it be better, worse?
2. do the rates in n and g scale to each other in any way as far as range and sensitivity? (24mbps g compared to like ~40mbps n)
All I can think of right now. wanting to buy some of these soon. thanks for input.
***Edit***
I was also wanting to know if the loco M and nano M will even be in 2.4Ghz, couldnt find any info about those
***Edit...again***
actually meant 2.4 Ghz for RocketM